Intelligence Testing for Children

Students taking a test in classroom

Robert Daly/OJO Images/Iconica/Getty Images

Intelligence testing is the estimation of a student's current intellectual functioning through a performance of various tasks designed to assess different types of reasoning. A student's intelligence quotient (IQ) is typically measured by standardized testing with norm-referenced tests.

While IQ tests have long been utilized, there is much debate over their overall usefulness and modern day relevance.

Intelligence involves the ability to think, solve problems, analyze situations, and understand social values, customs, and norms.

Two main forms of intelligence are involved in most intelligence assessments:

Intelligence is sometimes referred to as the intelligence quotient (IQ), cognitive functioning, intellectual ability, aptitude, thinking skills, and general ability.

Why Intelligence Testing May Be Important for Learning Disabled Students

Intelligence testing is done to better understand how well a child can be expected to perform academically and to assess a student's needs.

  • In the past, intelligence testing has been used to confirm or rule out the presence of learning disabilities and to establish IQ for the purposes of diagnosing an intellectual disability.
  • Depending on the type of intelligence test administered, it may provide important information on how students approach problem-solving.
  • Properly interpreted, intelligence testing may help educators develop appropriate specially designed instruction and educational strategies for individual educational plan (IEP) development.

Common Types of Intelligence Tests

IQ tests are one well-known form of normed testing. They compare "normal" skill levels to those of individual students of the same age. Intelligence tests (also called instruments) are published in several forms: 

  • Group intelligence tests usually consist of a paper test booklet and scanned scoring sheets. Group achievement tests, which assess academic areas, sometimes include a cognitive measure. In general, group tests are not recommended for the purpose of identifying a child with a disability. In some cases, however, they can be helpful as a screening measure to consider whether further testing is needed and can provide good background information on a child's academic history.
  • Individual intelligence tests may include several types of tasks and may involve easel test books for pointing responses, puzzle and game-like tasks, and question and answer sessions. Some tasks are timed. The Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC) and the Stanford Binet-Intelligence Scale, formerly known as the Binet-Simon Test, are examples of individualized intelligence tests. The WISC test includes language-, symbol-, and performance-based questions, while the Stanford-Binet test helps to diagnose students with cognitive disabilities.
  • Computerized tests are becoming more widely available, but as with all tests, examiners must consider the needs of the child before choosing this format.
  • Nonverbal intelligence tests, such as the Comprehensive Test of Nonverbal Intelligence (CTONI) and Universal Nonverbal Intelligence Test, Second Edition (UNIT2), are used to assess students who have language processing problems or those with limited English proficiency. In these tests, tasks are designed to remove verbal intelligence from the assessment of a child's reasoning abilities and to isolate and assess a student's spatial reasoning, analogical thinking, and problem-solving skills.
Was this page helpful?
Article Sources
Verywell Family uses only high-quality sources, including peer-reviewed studies, to support the facts within our articles. Read our editorial process to learn more about how we fact-check and keep our content accurate, reliable, and trustworthy.
  1. Cross TL, Cross JR. Challenging an idea whose time has gone. Roeper Rev. 2017;39(3):191-4. doi:10.1080/02783193.2017.1319000

  2. Grondhuis S, Lecavalier L, Arnold LE, et al. Differences in verbal and nonverbal IQ test scores in children with autism spectrum disorder. Res Autism Spectr Disord. 2018;49:47-55. doi:10.1016/j.rasd.2018.02.001

  3. Nicolas S, Andrieu B, Croizet J-C, Sanitioso RB, Burman JT. Sick? Or slow? On the origins of intelligence as a psychological object. Intelligence. 2013;41(5):699-711. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2013.08.006

  4. Kranzler KH, Maki KE, Benson NF, Eckert TL, Floyd RG, Fefer SA. How do school psychologists interpret intelligence tests for the identification of specific learning disabilities?. Contemp School Psychol. 2020;24:445-456. doi:10.1007/s40688-020-00274-0

  5. Borghans L, Golsteyn BHH, Heckman JJ, Humphries JE. What grades and achievement tests measure. PNAS. 2016;113(47):13354-9. doi:10.1073/pnas.1601135113

  6. Gibbons A, Warne RT. First publication of subtests in the Stanford-Binet 5, WAIS-IV, WISC-V, and WPPSI-IV. Intelligence. 2019;75:9-18. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2019.02.005

  7. Dehelen E, Kaya Fatih, Ritter NL. Test review: Comprehensive Test on Nonverbal Intelligence—Second Edition (CTONI-2). J Psychoedu Assess. 2012;30(2):209-13. doi:10.1177/0734282911415614