Should You Co-Bed Twins and Multiples in the NICU?

Two preemies share a crib in the hospital.
Two preemies share a crib in the hospital. Virginia Star/Getty Images

As a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) nurse, I love letting multiples sleep together when under my care. The practice of letting babies sleep together in the same crib or incubator is called cobedding and can be done with twins, triplets, or other multiples.

While there are benefits to letting multiples sleep together in the NICU, there may also be drawbacks to cobedding. Unfortunately, there haven't been a lot of studies done on the benefits and risks of cobedding multiples.

Possible Benefits 

Although nurses, parents and case studies agree that there are definite benefits to letting multiples sleep together in the NICU, there aren't enough large, well-designed scientific studies to prove any of the possible benefits for certain. Possible benefits of cobedding multiples include:

  • Enhanced developmental care: Developmental care is easing the transition to life by providing care that mimics the womb as much as possible. Letting multiples sleep together is the most basic way to promote developmental care. Cobedded multiples can see, touch, and smell each other at all times, much like they could before birth.
  • Less irritability: Looking at heart rate and other stress cues, cobedded multiples seem less irritable than other multiples. When multiples sleep together, they coordinate their sleep/wake cycles and have less stress.
  • Better weight gain: When multiples sleep together, they seem to gain weight better than multiples who are not cobedded.
  • Other possible benefits: Although no studies back up these benefits, case reports and nurses' observations have shown other benefits of cobedding multiples, including happier parents, fewer episodes of bradycardia, better thermoregulation, and lower oxygen needs.

Possible Risks 

It's important to note that no well-designed scientific studies have found any true risks to cobedding multiples in the NICU. However, nurses' reports and observations show some possible drawbacks to letting multiples sleep together:

  • Temperature instability: Although better thermoregulation is a possible benefit to cobedding multiples, poor thermoregulation is a possible risk when multiples are different sizes. For example, a smaller twin sleeping with a larger twin, for example, may get cold easily, or a larger twin could get hot.
  • Infection: Although there have been no reports of infection passing from one multiple to another due to cobedding, infection remains a possible risk when multiples sleep together.
  • Exposure to supplemental oxygen: When multiples sleep together but only one is on a nasal cannula, the other baby may be exposed to additional oxygen. High levels of supplemental oxygen can increase the risk of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP).
  • Errors in caregiving: When multiples are in the same bed together, nurses may inadvertently give the wrong baby a medication, mix up feeding amounts, or make other errors. Babies can also pull out each others feeding tubes or other equipment.
Was this page helpful?

Article Sources

Verywell Family uses only high-quality sources, including peer-reviewed studies, to support the facts within our articles. Read our editorial policy to learn more about how we fact-check and keep our content accurate, reliable, and trustworthy.
  1. Hayward K. Cobedding of twins: a natural extension of the socialization process?. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2003;28(4):260-3. doi:10.1097/00005721-200307000-00011


  2. Macho P. Individualized Developmental Care in the NICU: A Concept Analysis. Adv Neonatal Care. 2017;17(3):162-174. doi:10.1097/ANC.0000000000000374


  3. Lai NM, Foong SC, Foong WC, Tan K. Co-bedding in neonatal nursery for promoting growth and neurodevelopment in stable preterm twinsCochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;4(4):CD008313. Published 2016 Apr 14. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD008313.pub3


  4. Hartnett ME, Lane RH. Effects of oxygen on the development and severity of retinopathy of prematurityJ AAPOS. 2013;17(3):229–234. doi:10.1016/j.jaapos.2012.12.155


Additional Reading